Students in the 10th grade in Mississippi must take a multiple-choice English exam and an essay writing exam. These tests must be passed to graduate high school, and the current school accountability models are tied to them. The writing exam presents students with four essay prompts: two “informative” essay prompts, and two “narrative” essay prompts. Students are to write essays corresponding to one of the two prompts in each mode. So, despite my own distaste for the formula, unabated since I was trained to write the five-paragraph exam essay myself, we spent quite a lot of time preparing to write these essays, going over the difference between the “modes” (writing “off-mode” is an instant zero), and practicing with countless essays in each.
Then, three weeks before the test, in the middle of a lesson on narrative essays, the counselor enters my room to tell me that she just got word the state board has eliminated the narrative essay requirement. These students will not be tested on narrative writing. Upperclassmen who have still not passed will not be required to pass.
A few days later, in class at Ole Miss, I got the opportunity to speak with somebody powerful from Jackson (assistant state superintendent?). I told her how many hours we had spent preparing for this test — hours which could have been spent working on the informative essays, or on the components of the multiple choice test, or having conversations, or (dare I say it?) reading books — and I told her that I saw it as irresponsible to make this move three weeks before the test, and I asked her for some sort of explanation. The explanation was vague and brief (alluding to high failure rates, presumably in schools that shouldn’t have high failure rates), and she fed me a line about its being important to teach the narrative mode even in the absence of the test. Which is bullshit. Many of my students are marginally literate. Hardly any read competently. What they most need is what test preparation least gives them, but the test is standing between them and graduation; and it stands between the school and a designation indicating some degree of success, and the benefits that such designation confers. I have wasted hours preparing them for a test that now they don’t have to take, though they still have to take others. These have been wasted hours, and when there aren’t hours to waste.
I’m afraid this decision might not be merely irresponsible, but sinister. Is it unreasonable to suspect that the English II teachers in Oxford and Tupelo knew about this decision, or at least heard whispers of it, months ago?