Couzo called me from the road the other day. He was driving from North Carolina (where he’s going to school now) back to Mississippi, because through some friend working for the Obama campaign he lucked into a ticket to the first debate. As far as I know, no other friend or acquaintance from Mississippi was able to get in. He told me he’d be wearing a blue Carolina shirt, as if I’d be able to see him! Ha!

Staring into the camera from the front row, lower right corner. (A few more screen grabs at flickr.)

September 27, 2008 · Moments, Photos · 1 comment


One of the more annoying and unhelpful tics one sometimes encounters in discussing books is the unrestrained urge to fight with them. This seems to be especially common in discussions of ancient books, of religious books, and of Marx. (All three of which are required reading at St. John’s College.) Thankfully, after a while of having conversations about books in every class every day, most people at St. John’s do eventually realize that this way of approaching texts rarely leads anywhere interesting, and that other ways do, or else they at least absorb as a kind of local cultural etiquette that they ought to go easy on it.

Over the years I’ve heard a few bits of advice, or assertions, or aphorisms, that seem aimed at ameliorating these tendencies. Sometimes they seem exaggerated, or not clearly true, or even intellectually risky in some way or other, but always formulated as ways of improving conversation and consideration, and I’ve generally found them to be of some use.

One popular one is alleged to have been said by Emerson about a paper criticizing Plato (though perhaps an invention of a biographer — and paraphrased by Omar on The Wire): If you shoot at a king, you had better kill him. Another one that gets around is that, when reading a book that is truly great, you should read it as though you agreed with it completely, as though its author were right about everything, give yourself over to it, and then feel free to change your mind once you’ve made it through to the end. Another was said by some religious figure, perhaps a rabbi, to David Daube — a legal scholar who wrote extensively on the Bible — when, as a young man, Daube left a religious Jewish community to study the Bible in a secular university: if you must study the Bible in this way, do it like a surgeon who must operate on his father. I find that this can be a helpful perspective with many other books besides the Biblical ones.

 

We students in the Graduate Institute at St. John’s were recently given a helpful letter by Mr. Venkatesh on writing St. John’s essays, which several people new to the College understandably feel some trepidation about. I find one piece of his advice especially helpful, on the subject of fighting with texts. I hope he doesn’t mind my reproducing it here:

Picking Bones. If you plan on picking a fight with a book, I would recommend to you the following tripartite scheme: a) First get clear what the book is saying, and see why it would be compelling to an intelligent person; b) then articulate your dissatisfaction with it, and argue against a); then c) return to the book, and ask how it would respond to your objection. This way of picking bones with an author helps you to see a question more fully.

September 21, 2008 · Education, Friction, Literature · (No comments)


The first presidential debate of the election season will be hosted next Friday at Ole Miss. Dr. Mullins, Executive Assistant to the Chancellor (and who I believe has been some sort of university liaison for the event), told us in the Teacher Corps about the possibility of the University’s hosting a debate at least a couple of years ago. The planning has been enormous, and they’re expecting something like 3,000 journalists. I hear the place is already filling with reporters, and getting more attention than it’s gotten in a very long time.

I’m sure the symbolism of Obama’s participation will not be missed: the debate will be only a few days shy of the 46th anniversary of James Meredith‘s becoming the first black student to enroll at the school, and the accompanying riots that cost two lives (including that of an international journalist) and caused dozens of injuries. Bob Dylan wrote a song about it, and the bullet holes are still in the main administrative building.

 

Following the attention to symbolism, I remembered a small project conceived while still in Mississippi: mississippeponymy.

There are only two entries, and I’m not sure now that there will ever be more. But if you have suggestions (they need not be in Mississippi), do submit them.

September 19, 2008 · Friction, Politics, The South · (No comments)


I don’t have much love for multiple-choice tests — either for administering them or for taking them — but as a teacher, the format was sometimes required by my administration, and was sometimes useful for simple prove-that-you-read-it quizzes. Google Docs didn’t help me love them, but it did help me never grade them.

Here’s how:

(1) Go to Google Docs. If you don’t have a google account, you’ll have to set one up, but if you already use GMail or GReader or any of the other apps, you just need to log in.

(2) In the upper-left corner, open the New drop-down menu and select Form.

(3) You should now have a blank form. This will be your quiz. Give it a name where it says Untitled form and any additional text that will help your students (your name, class name, instructions, or whatever) in the box beneath it.

(4) Open the selection box for Question Type and select text. Next to Question Title, type “Name:” and check the box that says Make this a required question. (You might want to add a question for class period or ID number, too.  For me, a name was usually sufficient.)

(5) At the top-left of the page, click Add question and select Multiple choice to create the first test question. (You can choose others types of questions, too, of course. I often had a few open-ended paragraph response questions, but these require old-fashioned review and grading.)

(6) Type your question in the box next to Question Title. I recommend numbering it there, too. For example: “1) What is 5+5?” Add some Help Text if you want to (it’ll appear smaller and lighter beneath the question).

(7) Type the first possible response to the question in the Option 1 box. Click add ‘Other’ to add additional options, or just click in the “ghosted” second option to make it appear, and do the same thing again to add as many choices as you want. Be sure to include the correct answer as one and only one option!

(8) At the top-left of the page, click Add question to create the next question. Repeat steps (6) and (7).

(9) Repeat step (8) to make all the questions you want. If you want to change one you’ve already made, hover the mouse over it so that the pencil icon appears to the right, and click on that icon. You can also drag questions up and down to rearrange their order.

(10) When you’re finished, click Done on the active question, and click save on the top-right. If you click on More actions and Edit confirmation, you can edit the message that is displayed after the completed quiz is submitted. (Or you can leave it with the default message.)

(I recommend NOT clicking on any of the radio buttons, because if one is selected when you make the form, it’ll be selected by default for your students (or whomever) on the quiz. If you select one accidentally, make a new answer choice, select its radio button, and then delete it with the x button to its right. Be sure to save.)

(11) You should now have a link to the published form on the bottom of the page. You can copy and paste it into a mass email to your students, or link to it on a school web page (on Google Pages?), or make it more manageable at tinyurl.com and write it on the board. See the example I’m making right now (even take the very easy quiz) over here.

(12) Before any students take the quiz, take it yourself. Enter “ANSWER KEY” (or whatever you like) as your name and all the right answers. Click Submit.

(13) Now go back to Google Docs. You should see your quiz as one of your saved documents. Click on it and you’ll find all responses in a spreadsheet. The date and time of each response is stamped in column A (so you can have deadlines if you want them, and students can’t fake it), names in column B, and all of your questions in subsequent columns. (See what I mean in this example.)

(Once the deadline passes, if you don’t want to accept late submissions, you can click on More actions and select Stop accepting responses.)

(14) All the way on the left, where rows are numbered, between 1 and 2, you should see a gray rectangle. Click on it, and drag it down until it’s between 2 and 3. You should now be able to scroll down over all your students’ responses while the questions and the correct answers remain visible on the top for easy comparison.

(15) There should be a similar gray rectangle to the left of the A above the first column.  Click it and drag it to the right until it’s between the B and the C. You should now be able to scroll left and right through all of your students’ responses and still see the time of submission and the student names to the left.

 

Now, if you want Google to do all the grading for you (and of course you do), it gets slightly trickier. But it’s not too hard, and after you’ve done it once, it’s easy.

(16) Once a student has submitted their responses, click on the cell in the same row as their responses but to the right of the last one.  So, for instance, since the last question of my sample quiz is in column D, and my first student response is in row 3, I’m clicking on cell E3 (same row as the student, next column to the right after the last question).

(17) In the cell, enter a formula like this one: =arrayformula(sum(C$2:D$2=C3:D3))

Yours will be a little different from this one. The = sign indicates that what follows is a formula. The arrayformula() function indicates that whatever is wrapped inside its parentheses will have array inputs; the sum() function takes a sum of the arguments in its parentheses (or in this case, the number that return “true”); and the last stuff is the array that we’re actually counting.  

If none of that made sense, don’t worry. This is what you need to know: the C$2:D$2 means that the correct answers are in the cells between and including C2 and D2. If your quiz has many more questions, and the answers go from C2 and ZZ2 (or whatever), you’ll need to change that part of the formula to C$2:ZZ$2. Don’t forget the dollar signs! (They’ll be explained below.)

The C3:D3 means that the answers of the student whose answers are in this row are in the cells between and including C3 and D3. You’ll want to make these letters match the letters you used in the previous paragraph, since if the answers go from C to ZZ for the correct answer row, they should for the student, too. You’ll want the numbers to be one higher than what you used in the previous paragraph, since this student’s answers will be one row beneath the correct answers. Make sure you don’t have the dollar signs here!

So the formula sum(C$2:D$2=C3:D3) is asking how many cells between C2 and D2 are equal to the corresponding cells between C3 and D3. (We need to wrap all this in the arrayformula() function since these ranges of cells make up array data.)

If you don’t understand or care about any of this, just enter “=arrayformula(sum(X$#:Y$#=X@:Y@))” (without quotation marks) in the cell, replacing X with the column letter of the first correct answer, Y with the column letter of the last correct answer, # with the number of the row with the correct answers, and @ with the number of the row with the first student’s answers (probably one greater than the number of the row with the correct answers).

(18) Now, once you’ve entered that formula and hit enter, the cell should have the total number of that student’s answers that match the correct answers. When that cell is highlighted, there should be a little blue square in its lower-right corner.  Once all the students have submitted their answers, click on that square and drag it down to the last student’s row. This will copy the formula you entered into each row. (And since we had the $-sign in C$2 and D$2 (or wherever the answers were), those cell locations will be unchanged in all the new formulae; since we didn’t have the $-sign in C3 and D3 (or wherever the first student’s answers were), those cell locations will automatically increment for each row.)

(Unfortunately, you do have to wait for students to submit the answers before you drag these formulae down. If you drag them down into blank rows, the form will recognize that those rows are already in use and subsequent submissions will skip them.)

(19) If you want Google Docs to automatically calculate percentages, click on the cell to the right of the first student’s “total correct” cell (in other words, to the right of the one we just added a formula to). Enter an = sign, click on the student’s “total correct” cell, enter a / sign, and enter the total number of questions. So it should look something like this: =E3/2 . This divides the student’s number of total correct answers by the number of possible correct answers. When you hit enter, the cell will have a 1 if the student got 100%, a 0 if the student got a 0%, and a decimal for anything in between. If you click the Edit tab, and, while the cell is highlighted, click the Format drop-down menu, and then select one of the percentage options, the cell will be displayed as a standard percentage. You can do the drag-down procedure as before to copy this formula for all the other students as well.

 

It should look something like my example here. Once you know how to do this, it can save an enormous amount of time. I kept a blog for each class period, and posted the agenda and assignments every day. I would sometimes make a “take home quiz” like this and post the link. Other times, when I was required to give a multiple choice test at school, I would make it like this and administer it in the library or computer lab. And, of course, this same method can be easily modified for regular gathering of contact information on the first day of school (bonus: student email addresses will be copy-and-pastable), for learning-style inventories, for parent surveys, or just about anything else.

And I saved all that time for grading essays!

September 17, 2008 · Teachering · 56 comments


6.18 The Master said, “When native substance overwhelms cultural refinement, the result is a crude rustic. When cultural refinement overwhelms native substance, the result is a foppish pedant. Only when culture and native substance are perfectly mixed and balanced do you have a gentleman.”

7.8 The Master said, “I will not open the door for a mind that is not already striving to understand, nor will I provide words to a tongue that is not already struggling to speak. If I hold up one corner of a problem, and the student cannot come back to me with the other three, I will not attempt to instruct him again.”

8.2 The Master said, “If you are respectful but lack ritual you will become exasperating; if you are careful but lack ritual you will become timid; if you are courageous but lack ritual you will become unruly; and if you are upright but lack ritual you will become inflexible.”

8.17 The Master said, “Learn as if you will never catch up, and as if you feared losing what you have already attained.”

9.2 A villager from Daxiang remarked sarcastically, “How great is Confucius! He is so broadly learned, and yet has failed to make a name for himself in any particular endeavor.”

When the Master was told of this, he said to his disciples, “What art, then, should I take up? Charioteering? Archery? I think I shall take up charioteering.”

9.8 The Master said, “Do I possess wisdom? No, I do not. [For example, recently] a common fellow asked a question of me, and I came up completely empty. But I discussed the problem with him from beginning to end until we finally got to the bottom of it.

9.13 Zigong said, “If you possessed a piece of beautiful jade, would you hide it away in a locked box, or would you try to sell it at a good price?

The Master responded, “Oh, I would sell it! I would sell it! I am just waiting for the right offer.”

9.14 The Master expressed a desire to go and live among the Nine Yi Barbarian tribes. Someone asked him, “How could you bear their uncouthness?”

The Master replied, “If a gentleman were to dwell among them, what uncouthness would there be?”

9.18 The Master said, “I have yet to meet a man who loves Virtue as much as he loves female beauty.”

11.4 The Master said, “Yan Hui is of no help to me — he is pleased with everything that I say.”

12.8 Ji Zicheng said, “Being a gentleman is simply a matter of having the right native substance, and nothing else. Why must one engage in cultural refinement?”

Zigong replied, “It is regrettable, Sir, that you should speak of the gentleman in this way — as they say, ‘a team of horses cannot overtake your tongue.’

“A gentleman’s cultural refinement resembles his native substance, and his native substance resembles his cultural refinement. The skin of a tiger or leopard, shorn of its fur, is no different from the skin of a dog or sheep.”

13.21 The Master said, “If you cannot manage to find a person of perfectly balanced conduct to associate with, I suppose you must settle for the wild or the fastidious. In their pursuit of the Way, the wild plunge right in, while the fastidious are always careful not to get their hands dirty.”

14.3 The Master said, “When the state possesses the Way, be audaciously correct in both word and action; when the state lacks the Way, be audaciously correct in action, but let one’s speech be conciliatory.”

14.10 The Master said, “It is difficult to be poor and still free of resentment, but relatively easy to be rich without being arrogant.”

14.22 Zilu asked about serving one’s lord.

The Master replied, “Do not deceive him. Oppose him openly.”

14.24 The Master said, “In ancient times scholars learned for their own sake; these days they learn for the sake of others.”

14.25 Qu Boyu sent a messenger to Confucius. Confucius sat down beside him and asked, “How are things with your Master?”

The messenger replied, “My Master wishes to reduce his faults, but has not yet been able to do so.”

After the messenger left, the Master said, “Now that is a messenger! That is a messenger!”

14.28 The Master said, “The Way of the gentleman is threefold, and yet I have not been able to achieve any aspect of it: ‘The Good do not worry, the wise are not confused, and the courageous do not fear.’”

Zigong replied, “[By quoting this saying], the Master has in fact described himself.”

14.29 Zigong was given to criticizing others.

The Master remarked sarcastically, “What a worthy man that Zigong must be! As for me, I hardly have the time for this.”

15.16 The Master said, “I have never been able to do anything for a person who is not himself constantly asking, ‘What should I do? What should I do?’”

15.17 The Master said, “People who can spend an entire day together indulging their predilection for petty cleverness, without their conversation ever once touching upon rightness — these are hard cases indeed!”

15.36 The Master said, “When it comes to being Good, defer to no one, not even your teacher.”

17.8 The Master said, “Zilu! Have you heard about he six [virtuous] words and their six corresponding vices?”

Zilu replied, “I have not.”

“Sit! I will tell you about them.

“Loving Goodness without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of foolishness. Loving wisdom without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of deviance. Loving trustworthiness without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of harmful rigidity. Loving uprightness without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of intolerance. Loving courage without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of unruliness. Loving resoluteness without balancing it with a love for learning will result in the vice of willfulness.”

19.19 When the Meng Family appointed Yang Fu to be their Captain of the Guard, he went to ask Master Zeng for advice. Master Zeng said, “It has been a long time since those above lost the Way, and so the people lack guidance. When you uncover the truth in a criminal case, proceed with sorrow and compassion. Do not be pleased with yourself.”

19.24 Shusun Wushu was disparaging Confucius.

Zigong said, “It is pointless, Confucius cannot be disparaged. The worthiness of other people is like a hill or mound, in that one can still climb to the top of it. Confucius is like the sun and the moon — it is impossible to surmount him. Even if a person wished to cut himself off from their radiance, what harm could he do to the sun and the moon? All this would serve to show is that such a person did not know his limits.”

- The Analects of Confucius, translated by Edward Slingerland

September 16, 2008 · Literature, Quotations · (No comments)